WAREHOUSES

Your count is not wrong.
It is just in four systems.

Two buildings, a client running their own WMS, a dropship vendor and a spreadsheet that arrives by email on Tuesdays. Every one of them is telling the truth about its own corner. None of them can tell you what you have.

Scan the zone. See what is in it.

Inventory View starts empty on purpose. Scan a zone name and it resolves what is physically in that location, whichever system owns the count.

Inventory ManagementOMNIWAREHOUSEBETAMASupport1
Inventory View
Inventory Move
Picking
Inventory Creator
Inventory ViewFind Product
Scan zone name Scan
Scan a ZoneScan a zone name to view the items in it

The live screen, waiting.

Inventory ManagementOMNIWAREHOUSEBETAMASupport1
Scan zone nameUNJ-A-14-CScan

Zone UNJ-A-14-C

Union NJ · rack A, level 14, position C · last counted 26 Jul

Items

4

SKUUPCOn handATSCount source
NL-TEE-BLK-M889432104772312288OMNI
NL-TEE-WHT-L889432104789140140OMNI
HG-MUG-12OZ712398445021864720Camelot WMS
CB-CANDLE-VN6042158890139660Camelot WMS

One zone. Two count sources. One list.

The count can be yours, theirs, or ours

This is the part that decides whether an inventory layer is worth having. OMNI does not need to own the count to be useful, and it says on every row where the number came from.

Ours

Run OMNI inventory directly. Scan receiving, put away to a zone, move, count. The record is created where the work happens rather than typed in afterwards.

Theirs

Your client runs their own WMS and has no intention of stopping. Aggregator ingests their feed, whether that is an API, an FTP drop, a portal or a spreadsheet in an inbox.

Both, on the same screen

Mixed sources in one zone is the normal case, not the exception. The count source column means nobody has to remember which building trusts which system.

On hand is not available to sell

Three of the four rows above show a lower ATS than on hand, and that gap is where oversells come from. ATS subtracts what is already committed, so the number you publish is the number you can actually ship.

312 on hand, 288 available

Twenty four units are spoken for. Publishing 312 sells stock that is already leaving the building, and the apology lands on your client rather than on the channel.

864 on hand, 720 available

A vendor owned count with commitments against it. Set a floor and Balancer will publish zero rather than risk the last few units, which is usually cheaper than a cancelled order.

Built for the floor, not the office

Inventory Management is four working screens, and the tools that surround them exist because someone on a warehouse floor needed them at seven in the morning.

Inventory View

Scan a zone, see what is there, drill into any SKU.

Inventory Move

Relocate stock between zones with the movement recorded as it happens.

Picking

Work the pick, with the order line and the location on the same screen.

Inventory Creator

Bring new stock into the system without waiting on a back office import.

Pick Ticket Generator

Paperwork for the floor, generated from the live order line.

Inventory Label Generator

Location and stock labels printed from the same record.

UPC Label Generator

UPC labels off the catalog, so the barcode matches the item record.

Bulk Mark Ship

Close out a batch in one action instead of one order at a time.

All eight are live screens in OMNI today.

Situations this gets built for

Not testimonials. These are shapes of operation we work in, with names removed.

Four WMS platforms, twenty two sites

A prep and fulfillment operator where four systems disagreed and most of the resulting exception volume turned out to be noise rather than real problems.

The counts were not the issue. Reconciling them was.

Two million square feet, three regions

Freight landing on one coast and shipping from another, with stock moving between buildings mid order.

Port to door visibility, without replacing what ran the buildings.

Client keeps their own WMS

An operator whose largest account runs proprietary systems and will not migrate, ever.

Addition rather than migration was the only workable answer.

Start with your messiest zone

Not the tidy one. Pick the location your team argues about, the one where the count and the shelf part company most often. Connect what already runs it, scan it, and compare what comes back against what your current system says. If it does not hold up, nothing changed and nobody outside your building saw it.

Privacy Overview

This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to collect information about how you interact with our website and allow us to remember you. We use this information in order to improve and customize your browsing experience and for analytics and metrics about our visitors both on this website and other media. To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy.

If you decline, your information won’t be tracked when you visit this website. A single cookie will be used in your browser to remember your preference not to be tracked.